Author: admin

IQ Tests

Being skilled at chess does not make one skilled at babysitting. Being an excellent bedroom lover does not imply advanced skill in a chemistry lab. Piano virtuosity does not mean street smarts.

IQ Tests measure only how skilled one is at taking an IQ test – most often in the form of sit down exams and multiple choice questions, a format largely used in the education systems by those who developed the tests themselves. They are inherently flawed and biased.

For example: one has to be stupid to not recognize Mensa IQ tests measure not IQ but how one connects dots and squiggly lines on a multiple choice page. That this has anything to do with “general intelligence” is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

Tupac Shakur once said of his Mother, in the song “Dear Momma”, that she “made miracles every thanksgiving.”

A Black Mother in a Ghetto in 1907ce with no classroom education who had never heard of a multiple choice exam let alone taken one would likely not fare as well on a squiggly line and dot timed test as a white student in Virginia on a plantation attempting to go to Princeton with the help of a tutor and a private academy with a lifetime of practice on such exams and exam formats.

That white student would, no doubt, be less capable of performing miracles at the dinner table for their family than that woman.

IQ tests were designed with the racist intent of deceptively supporting the lie that white student is smarter than that Black Mother – and with the intent to support a racist argument that the Black Mother in the Ghetto is not there because of racist whites but because she is stupider than them.

They were developed for racists and by racists. To this day they remain a tool of racists who refuse to acknowledge that these tests were designed for Black People in Somalia to score lower that White People in New England not due to general intelligence but due to the manner in which people receive education – and what skills are valued.

In short: IQ tests are bullshit.

That there are people with educational barriers and obstacles is a reality.

There is and needs to be a Special Olympics.

But this has nothing to do with squiggly dots on a timed multiple choice exam, nor is being skilled on squiggly dot exams any indication a parent enduring poverty can perform miracles for their children, which is of course a much more important skill to have.

IQ Tests

Being skilled at chess does not make one skilled at babysitting. Being an excellent bedroom lover does not imply advanced skill in a chemistry lab. Piano virtuosity does not mean street smarts.

IQ Tests measure only how skilled one is at taking an IQ test – most often in the form of sit down exams and multiple choice questions, a format largely used in the education systems by those who developed the tests themselves. They are inherently flawed and biased.

For example: one has to be stupid to not recognize Mensa IQ tests measure not IQ but how one connects dots and squiggly lines on a multiple choice page. That this has anything to do with “general intelligence” is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.

Tupac Shakur once said of his Mother, in the song “Dear Momma”, that she “made miracles every thanksgiving.”

A Black Mother in a Ghetto in 1907ce with no classroom education who had never heard of a multiple choice exam let alone taken one would likely not fare as well on a squiggly line and dot timed test as a white student in Virginia on a plantation attempting to go to Princeton with the help of a tutor and a private academy with a lifetime of practice on such exams and exam formats.

That white student would, no doubt, be less capable of performing miracles at the dinner table for their family than that woman.

IQ tests were designed largely and with the racist intent of showing that white student is smarter than that Black Mother – and with the intent to support a racist argument that the Black Mother in the Ghetto is not there because of racist whites but because she is stupider than them.

They were developed for racists and by racists. To this day they remain a tool of racists who refuse to acknowledge that these tests were designed for Black People in Somalia to score lower that White People in New England not due to general intelligence but due to the manner in which people receive education – and what skills are valued.

In short: IQ tests are bullshit.

That there are people with educational barriers and obstacles is a reality.

There is and needs to be a Special Olympics.

But this has nothing to do with squiggly dots on a timed multiple choice exam, nor is being skilled on squiggly dot exams any indication a parent enduring poverty can perform miracles for their children, which is of course a much more important skill to have.

Racism in Canadian Curriculum regarding the “American Revolution”

Hello,

The “American Revolution” is introduced in Regional Public Schools in grade 5 during the European History in Canada unit – specifically the lesson on the “loyalists.”

The fundemental, core curriculum, introduction of the American Revolution is:

“The British were fighting France in a war, they taxed the Americans to fund that war, and the Americans revolted.”

No.

The British Crown and Parliament accented in 1772 to the Somerset v Stewart judgement which stated there was no legal basis for slavery in the British Empire.  

They accented by remaining silent after the ruling – and thereby indicated their acceptance of it.  

In other words: the British King and Parliament accepted slavery was illegal in the British Empire in 1772.

“The French” as referenced in the grade 5 unit that the British were fighting were themselves fighting domestically in France in the French Revolutionary War.  

Those “French” the grade 5’s are told of lost that war.  

They lost TO ABOLITIONISTS who then passed full abolition in France and Constitutional Bill of human rights in 1794-95.  

Those ABOLITIONISTS fought to destroy the “code noir” of Louis XIV – which was a brutal, racist, horrific codification regulating and formally legalizing slavery in the French empire. 

That First French Republic was defeated by Napoleon who immediately relegalized slavery in France in 1802 with a specific focus on keeping slavery legal in the French colonies in what is called North America. 

Those French Slavers that the Brits were fighting in the 1770s provided the guns and most of all the gunpowder to George Washington and the continental army.

Washington was a brutal slaver from Virginia.  He was also the great grandfather of Robert E Lee who led the confederate army when Abraham Lincoln and “THE NORTH” – who were strong and supported freedom – finished what the Brits had initiated: which was the abolition of slavery in the colonies.  

(Lee married into Washington – Dandridge – Custis slaver family…marrying the granddaughter of Washington’s adopted son, who he had raised since he was 3).

As encyclopedia Britannica says: ultimately French gun powder is what won the war for Washington.

The American revolutionary war was slavers in the states allying with slavers in France as *both* were fighting wars against ascendant Abolitionism – including at the Crown of England level.

And Washington at no point, ever, stated a desire to end slavery nor at any point *ever* legislated regarding conditions of slavery domestically.  

The only references to slavery he put his name on is Humans with Black Skin were 3/5th human and in the Fairfax resolves that, in a careful reading of, expressed a desire for american slavers to take full control of the international trade as it effected the colonies while comparing Black people to a domestic resource such as wood in the resolves…and makes no reference to the conditions of domestic slavery nor the desire to end it at all.

That’s the truth.  

The so called “american revolution” was a war against abolition by an alliance of French slavers and American ones.  

That’s the truth.  Full stop.  

The curriculum has to get this right, starting with the Somerset case – including referencing the slaver from whom the person who used the name James Somerset (who was a Black Person who had been kidnapped in West Africa at the age of 8) escaped *was the paymaster general of the Americans customs board based out of Boston harbour where the “Boston tea party” occurred shortly after the ruling.*

It is *exceptionally racist* to ignore the central, absolute, place of slavery – and slavers fighting ascendent abolitionism – when teaching of the so called “american revolution.” 

It was a war of slavers against abolition.  Period.

That’s the truth.  Full stop. 

Judaism, Islam, and Christianity

All of these religions are the exact same at their core.

The story of the flood is one biological family of humans is led onto an arc – as well as two of each animal on earth.

Everyone else is drowned – slowly, horrifically, as painfully as possible, the water gradually rising over a period of days.

The babies. The toddlers. The people. The puppies. The kittens. The baby elephants. The little bear cubs. The Moms, the Dads.

Horrific, terrifying, brutal deaths. All of them murdered by the “god” of the scriptures of Judaism, Islam, and Christianity.

Today? That story is one of the first stories taught to billions of children as they learn to read.

In bright, comic book like colours, and the kids enjoy seeing the cute racoon’s come up the gangplank of the arc.

Smiling cartoon characters and then a boat on the water is what they see – portrayed not as “god” mass murdering but being “merciful” in “saving” those on the arc.

That’s Judaism, Islam, and Christianity in a nutshell. All I just said.

Absolutely pure evil, venerating absolutely pure evil, teaching horrific and psychologically traumatizing murderous terror to children…but pointing towards the cute racoons on a gangplank going on the arc saying “look at how cute our religion is, we love those 2 racoons.”

These religions are absolutely and completely pure evil. Because drowning everyone on earth, animals included, except for two of each species is absolutely and completely pure evil and celebrating or venerating something that does or wants to is absolutely and completely pure evil. And Judaism, Christianity, and Islam do. That’s what their religions are. Full Stop.

Unless you support drowning everyone on earth and then teaching children to read through a children’s story about how cute the 2 bears walking up the gangplank onto an ark – deep down you agree with me.

These religions are supportive of all powerful beings drowning baby elephants. And kittens. And puppies. And baby humans.

They are absolutely evil religions…obviously. Duh.